Welcome to MNTRN - The Interactive Education Network for Talent Acquisition Professionals
Become a member of Minnesota Technical Recruiters Network, right now!
Main Menu
Event Calendar
July 2010
Add event Submit Event
S M T W T F S
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
About MNTRN
The Return of Recruiters - SHRM
The Return of Recruiters
Will staffing professionals be the first or last to be hired as the economy recovers?

Amid accumulating signs that the Great Recession is moderating, companies that believe their core business is improving may begin to restore the employee positions they shed over the last several months.

Has the hiring begun? More to the point, are these companies building up their depleted cadres of staffing professionals in anticipation of employee hiring? Could the hiring of recruiters be, in the terminology of The Conference Board’s monthly national report, a leading economic indicator?

Experts’ opinions vary, but taken together their answers present a vision of workplace recruiting operations after the recession that will be quite different from the staffing models of a few years ago.


Help Wanted?

Angie Salmon, senior vice president of the executive recruiting firm EFL Associates in Leawood, Kan., says some organizations are starting to hire "because they feel more confident about the market and their businesses."

A recent survey by recruitment consulting company DoubleStar of West Chester, Pa., bears this out. Asked late last year whether they planned to increase hiring activity in the first quarter of 2010, 27 percent of respondents—representing organizations in the Mid-Atlantic states—said yes. This represented "a pretty good bump" over the 13 percent who indicated such plans for the fourth quarter of 2009, according to CEO Harry Griendling.

And the Society for Human Resource Management’s latest Leading Indicators of National Employment (LINE) report, released in March, revealed that hiring was up on an annual basis for the fifth straight month. The percentage of companies hiring in manufacturing will reach a level not seen since June 2008, according to the report, and the percentage of companies hiring in the service sector is the highest since July 2007. The LINE report is based on a monthly survey of private-sector HR professionals at more than 500 manufacturing and 500 service-sector companies.

Mitch Beck, president of Crossroads Consulting in Monroe, Conn., has seen hiring pick up but notes that some companies are keeping quiet about it. "What I’m finding is that more companies are starting to hire back but don’t want people to know they’re hiring back, because they don’t want to get inundated" with applications, he says.

Not everyone is optimistic, however, that economic recovery will translate into more jobs. Scott Craighead, general manager, Americas, of Bluesky Executive Search in Fairfield, Conn., says that, in general, "Economic recovery has occurred without hiring increases, as companies have focused on staff cuts to yield profits."

Even if they aren’t cutting staff, companies may not be bringing new hires on board. For example, "Smaller hedge funds that need to hire are standing on the sidelines," says Ev Nucci, owner of Nucci Consulting Group of Gwynedd Valley, Pa., a retained search firm serving the hard-hit asset management industry. "A friend of mine who owns a hedge fund needs four or five people but is holding off" because of concerns about the economy, she explains.

Still, companies with skeleton crews can’t operate that way much longer, says executive search consultant Kevin Palisi of Norwalk, Conn. "You’re going to see more hiring because [companies] can’t squeeze any more blood out of the [surviving] workforce, from a productivity standpoint."


Leading or Lagging Indicator?

"This recession has decimated HR departments and, along with it, recruiting departments," Griendling observes.

Are reinforcements on the way?

Those who think companies plan to increase overall hiring in the near term believe so. For example, Mark Mehler, principal of CareerXroads, a staffing strategy consultancy in Kendall Park, N.J., says certain online companies "are hiring in volume." Those companies—and others wishing to add to employment rolls—must first hire recruiters, he explains, noting that "Recruiting is a bellwether for the economy."

Palisi also believes that organizations "are interested in bringing in recruiters in the near term, the anticipation being they will hire more staff in 2010." He adds that companies "need to hire recruiters six months ahead of the curve."

Others say companies will continue to make do with the resources they have on hand for a while and that an increase in recruiter hiring could actually be a lagging indicator of recovery.

"Usually the first person to get fired and last person to get hired back in a recession is the recruiter," says Dan Finnigan, CEO of Jobvite, a Burlingame, Calif.-based marketer of technology for recruiting via online social networks. "Many companies will actually not hire recruiters right away and be forced to recruit with a smaller recruiting team."

He cites a client—an online retailer—that hired 60 employees in six months during 2009. "They tripled [the workforce] and did it with one recruiter," he says.

Griendling notes that after a recession, companies tend to test the waters by hiring temporary workers as opposed to regular full- or part-time employees. And, in fact, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that 284,000 temporary-help jobs have been added nationwide since September 2009, including 48,000 in February. According to Griendling, it isn’t until later in a recovery, when companies start hiring non-temporary workers, that recruiters are brought on board.

Lisa Rowan, program director, HR, learning and talent strategies, for advisory services provider IDC in Framingham, Mass., expects hiring of temporary workers "to come up further before we see any surge in permanent employment."


Get in Line

Companies looking to grow their workforces may turn to transitional help, such as staffing agencies and freelancers, before hiring recruiters.

As piles of resumes roll into their headquarters, companies find it "easier to inundate an outside recruiter" such as an agency, according to Beck.

Staffing firms and consulting firms confirm the trend. Tracy Cutone, partner and general manager, Human Resources Divisions, of the staffing firm Winter, Wyman Cos. in Waltham, Mass., says demand for contract recruiters from its clients was up more than 85 percent between the third and fourth quarters of 2009.

Griendling adds that his company, DoubleStar, was hired by four new clients in a recent 60-day period, and it has its "largest new business pipeline in the last year and a half."

Freelancers may be in line ahead of staff recruiters, too. "Small to mid-size firms are bringing the search function in-house [by] hiring ex-search consultants to be their in-house recruiter on a contract basis," Nucci says.


A New Model

Another strategy being used as companies try to do more with less: Many are asking hiring managers and employees to take on more staffing responsibilities. Some experts believe this trend could continue for some time, so even after some semblance of a professional recruiting operation is restored, veteran staffing professionals may not recognize it.

"The hiring manager will no longer just be the end of the road for hiring decisions, but also the person identifying talent," Finnigan says.

"Hiring managers, although not experts in recruiting, will be forced to be," Salmon agrees.

Also taking on more recruiting tasks, according to Salmon, are ordinary employees in other departments. "Responsibility for recruiting has been pushed out into the organization," she says.

Finnigan calls it a whole-company approach to recruitment. "Employees will be called upon to make referrals and publicize jobs. Even executives will need to be on the front lines. … Referral hiring is the nirvana of recruiting," but it’s not easy. So, he says, companies are asking employees to tap into their personal online social networks. Instead of posting and advertising job listings, businesses are seeing if they can get their first round of applicants through referrals.

What is lost with this strategy, Salmon notes, "is the expertise in recruiting, particularly the recruiting of passive candidates" by staffing experts who have built their own, focused networks and developed the skills to manipulate them efficiently.

Using professional recruiters is still "the best way to find the right people," Salmon says.


Recruiting Recruiters, Finally

Eventually, organizations will become too lean. "Once it gets to that point, companies are going to realize that their people are working 24/7 and are maxed out on productivity," Craighead says. "When people scream and say, ‘I can’t take it anymore,’ they will have to hire."

He adds, however, that businesses are unlikely to rehire experienced recruiters back to pre-recession levels. "Companies will act cautiously in rehiring them," he says.

Finnigan concludes that companies are going to hire recruiters eventually, but not until after a lot of other things happen. "When you see that spike, you’ll know we’re in a recovery," he says.

In recovery, Finnigan predicts, the recession will leave a sharpened emphasis on the bottom line. "Before companies are going to build up recruiting staffs, they’re going to ask for the [return on investment] in doing so. … Before HR will get approval to hire more recruiters, they will have to answer the question, how much money must we spend?"

______________________________________

Steve Taylor’s most recent article for Staffing Management magazine, “Sometimes More Is More,” appeared in the October-December 2009 issue.
______________________________________

Reprinted with permission from the Society of Human Resource Management (SHRM) for inclusion July 15 - September 15, 2010. Taylor, Steve. "The Return of Recruiters". May 5, 2010. Accessed online at http://www.shrm.org/Publications/StaffingManagementMagazine/EditorialContent/Pages/0410taylor.aspx on July 15, 2010.

Recruiting is Not The Answer To Finding Talent !!!


The world of corporate recruiting and agency recruiting has become a secretarial task.  Retrieve resumes that fit the qualifications, forward to hiring managers, set up interviews...yada...yada..yada.  Is this really recruiting?  Do you really need a special talent to do that?  Sounds like a secretarial job to me. 

What are we really looking for?  Are we really looking for talent? Are recruiters and hiring managers even equipped to make hiring decisions?  How can we stop finding resumes and start finding talent?!!

It is true that recruiters are spending more time reading about their profession, getting continual education about hiring and interviewing processes and contributing within social circles such as Linkedin and ERE and others.  All this education, all this reading, only to here from your hiring manager, who has no formal or informal training, say, "No, I did not like this candidate"

And you say, "Well, okay, why Bob?  What is it that you did not like about him/her?

"I don't know, just a feeling I have".

I wonder if that feeling came from something Bob ate for lunch, or the phone call he just got from his spouse yelling at him because he forgot about Billy's recital, or, that he just got a tongue lashing from his boss for missing a deadline.  Or, better yet, Bob thinks, "hmm, this person is too good, he could do my job, HELL NO!"

Here are the questions that come up in my mind,

1.       Should organizations leave it up to hiring managers to make final hiring decisions?  Or, should it be a collective decision within the organization?

2.       Shouldn't hiring managers receive some formal training for interviewing and selection processes?

3.       Why don't more organizations train hiring managers on how to interview which would enable them to make better selections?

4.       Are we hiring Resume's or People?

5.       Are we really searching for talent or are we just looking for resumes?

Let me go back to the beginning so I could try to make my point.  Let's go way back.  I come from a poor background, child of immigrant parents that had no formal education or profession.  In high school I was not a particularly good student.  I did not do particularly well on my SAT's and no college in their right mind would give me a second look, except of course community college.  I spent my first year in college basically majoring in "Space", and I do not mean astronomy, I mean "taking up space".  But something happened.  I met a man who told me that I had a special gift.  That gift was in recruiting and sourcing.  He believed that if I applied myself, that I could be one of the best, ever!!  To tell you the truth, I did not believe him at first, but it was great to have a fan, especially, when you spent your life in mediocrity.  I still remember his words, "Kid, I am a head hunter, and you may not have much of a resume, but I know talent when I see it!!"

Well, in the hopes of not sounding like I am tooting my own horn, he was right.   I went into business with him and have billed millions upon millions of dollars.  Together, we will able to build a double digit multi- million dollar corporation and today we are a bi-costal organization, with over 40 recruiters and 400 contractors.  Today I can testify to you that it would have never happened if this man judged me based on my resume and did not care enough to see my talent.

In my years of experience, I have come to realize that "Recruiters" really fall into two catagories:

1.       Recruiters (people who can find resumes)

2.       Talent Identifier  

I truly believe that most people, who are hard working, can communicate well and willing to be creative in their searching methodologies, can be good recruiters.  However, I also believe that not everyone can be a good "Talent Identifier".    Identifying talent is a unique skill.  Could you train someone to be a good Talent Identifier?  Maybe.  But I can tell you that this skill is drastically overlooked and tremendously underestimated.    There is so much emphasis placed on the "perfect resume", that the point of finding talented people to join your organization is lost.  Moreover, organizations are allowing hiring managers to make hiring decisions without any training or support.  The results are usually hiring decisions based on "feelings" and other bias's that they may have.    The skill of finding talent is rarely seen during interviewing by even skilled recruiters and even less by hiring managers. 

Caring enough about people is the main ingredient in identifying talent and it is rarely practiced.  As if interviewing with caring creates poor judgment.  Well, this is not entirely false, if you are only hiring because you feel "sorry" for someone.  However, this is not what I am suggesting.  I argue that if you cared enough about people and who they are, you would be able to identify talent.

 I do have clients that are good hiring decision makers and more that are just really bad at it.  The good ones are usually excellent communicators that work closely with their team, hiring managers, collectively discuss candidates and care enough about people to attempt to identify talent during the interview process.  The less successful hiring practices are usually organizations that rely on one hiring manager, who hires solely based on feelings and resume.  Now, I do understand the relevance of a resume and interviewing.  I even understand the human nature of making decisions based on feelings.  But, is this really the best methodology for identifying talent.  As far as I am concerned, NO!!

Please don't throw a stone at me after you read the next statement, but, if you ask me, anyone can be a recruiter.  It is no wonder that many recruiters fall into the profession by default.  To exacerbate this point, (again, please don't send me any hate mail), there are only few recruiters around the country that are really good.  Most are not.  Some, because it is not their talent, but mostly because they fail to understand that the only way you can find talent is by truly caring about people.  Anyone can find resume's.  The questions is can you challenge yourself to find killer talent for your company.  If you think you can, then it requires some major changes to company hiring philosophies and your resolve to really look for talented individuals based on a different measuring stick.    I continue to read many articles on this board that speak about the dysfunctional methodology of using resumes as a way to make hiring decisions.  In my opinion, most of the articles are pretty accurate.  However, I have yet to read an article regarding how corporate America is re-evaluating hiring strategies and how they intend to revolutionize the practice of recruitment and talent search. 

I do understand that I have not provided you with all of the practical solutions for Talent finding, other than caring, but don't despair, I will write again.  Then again, why wait for me?  Why not be a pioneer!!!  Every industry evolves.  Isn't it time for Corporate Recruiting to evolve.  I Challenge you to stop recruiting and start searching for talent!!!   But first you must understand the basic principle of talent finding.  Talent Identifying 101 - Searching for talent starts with caring about people.

Do you really care enough to find them?  

URL: http://www.mntrn.org/modules/planet/view.article.php/565
Trackback: http://www.mntrn.org/modules/planet/trackback.php/565

Job Listings / Resumes
Login
Username:

Password:


Lost Password?

Register now!
Current Weather
Minneapolis
Conditions as of
18 minutes ago
overcast
Temp: 70 °F (21 °C)
Rel hum: 78 %
Dewpt: 63 °F (17 °C)
29.97 inHg (1015 hPa) 
Wind increasing
SE at 9.2 mph (4.1 mps)
view forecast